Family Identity
Throughout history teenagers have found their identity not only in their cultures and communities, but also in their families. Since children lived with their families at least until they reached their teen years, it seemed obvious that they would get much of their identity from that family. With our modern emphasis on individualism, we tend to downplay family identity, sometimes even thinking that it is unfair to emphasize who our parents and grandparents are. Such thinking is quite out of line with early Christian thought.
New Testament Times
The New Testament begins with talking about family identity by giving the genealogy of Jesus Christ, the son of David, the son of Abraham (Matthew 1). Most devout Jews of his day could give a genealogy similar to this one about Jesus because their family history was of vital importance. How many generations can you give in your family? Can you name your great-grandparents? How about your great-great-grandparents? How about your great-great-great grandparents? Jesus, and most of those living in his day, could name their ancestors for hundreds of years.
Of course, “Jesus son of David” sounds strange to us. We usually do not name our children Jesus, but remember that “Jesus” is the same as the Old Testament name “Joshua.” In addition, rather than saying “son of David,” we would say “David’s son.” Therefore, the way we might say his name that would be more familiar to us would be “Joshua Davidson.”
A quick search through an address book results in finding many names ending in “son.” John’s son is there as Johnson. Peter’s son is there as Peterson. Also there are Benson, Jackson, Robertson, Stevenson, Williamson—and the list could go on and on. In fact, if you would follow Jesus genealogy in Matthew 1, Jesus’ father would have been “Joe Jacobson” (because his father’s name was Jacob).
As we saw in Chapter 2, the “bar” in “bar mitzvah” meant “son of.” That is, at the age of 13, the young man became a “son of the commandment.” Wherever you see a name beginning with “Bar,” that means “son of.” Sometimes this is translated both ways for us, “A blind man, Bartimaeus (that is, the son of Timaeus)” as begging and began to shout, “Jesus, son of David, have mercy on me!” (Mark 10:46-47). When Jesus was talking to Simon Peter in Matthew 16:17, some translators translate it as “Simon Barjona.” However, others translate it as “Simon, son of Jonah.” These passages are filled with references to family identity, whether they are translated as “Bar….” or “son of ….”
Furthermore, note that the “Bar” does not mean only the son of one’s immediate biological father, but also the son of any ancestors before him. As we have seen, Jesus was repeatedly referred to as “son of David” (Davidson). Family identity went much further back than one’s biological father so that “son of” referred to an ancestor centuries before. As we saw in the first verse of the New Testament, Jesus’ genealogy went back to Abraham. In Luke 3 it goes back to “…the son of Seth, the son of Adam, the son of God.”
Paul wrote, “I am an Israelite myself, a descendent of Abraham, from the tribe of Benjamin” (Romans 11:1). Every Jew knew at least that he was a son of Abraham, and a son of Isaac, and a son of Jacob, and then which child of Jacob (for Paul it was Benjamin) was his or her ancestor. Family identity was very important so everyone knew his or her family identity.
USA Years Ago
The emphasis on family identity continued for centuries. My grandfather’s generation born in the late nineteenth century was proud of the Koteskey family history. He and his brothers and sisters talked about the Koteskeys in Bohemia during the fifteenth century being followers of John Huss. You have probably never heard of John Huss, and perhaps not even of Bohemia. However, John Huss was greatly influenced by the writings of the fourteenth century English reformer John Wycliffe, whose name most missionary kids have heard at one time or another. Bohemia was part of what is now the Czech Republic, and statues of Huss abound in Prague.
Followers of Huss became known as Hussites. Many of them were driven from Bohemia after Huss was burned at the stake for denying the infallibility of the Pope and asserting the authority of Scripture over the church. They went to Moravia where they continued to worship God as they saw fit. You may have never heard of the Moravians, but they were the ones who were singing in the middle of a storm during the eighteenth century when John Wesley was returning to England as a defeated missionary to native Americans. Wesley was amazed at their peace in the face of death and was greatly influenced by the Moravians in the founding of the Methodist Church.
As a teenager at the middle of the twentieth century, such oral “family history” seemed quaint to me. I did not really pay much attention to this part of my identity because I had internalized the individuality so prominent at that time. However, now I treasure that part of my identity. What happened to that emphasis on family identity?
USA Today
No one factor is responsible for the loss of family identity. Values have changed over the years so that people no longer prize the family as they once did. Behaviors have changed as well so that people now commonly do things with approval that would have been frowned on a century ago. Here are some of the changes that have occurred.
What can adolescent TCKs do?
Of course, many other factors also have contributed to the loss of family identity. Given that family identity is no longer what it used to be, the question is what can adolescents do. Following is a list of some things people have tried with success. Of course, no one would want to do all of these, but your family may enjoy trying some of them.